I genuinely believe this is not a bad time to be in education. And yet:
- In 2015/16, the only subjects where the Teacher Supply Model (TSM) recruitment target was met were English, History and PE. This shortfall represents 3400 fewer secondary trainees entering the profession than were needed (although the news this week is that PE and English teachers make poor super heads so maybe this is not such a good thing for our schools in the future).
- South-East headteachers are currently considering a 4-day week to cope with the increasing financial cuts.
- A BBC report posted today confirmed that 30% of the 2010 teaching intake had left within 5 years of taking up teaching.
- Earlier this month, SecEd referenced research which indicated that a combination of long hours and insufficient CPD has led to only 48% of teachers lasting more than 10 years in the profession (which explains why I am feeling increasingly old every time I deliver an assembly).
- A report from the EEF on marking and feedback concludes that we still don’t know what works.
That’s a lot of foreshadowing but I think we could pretty much summarise the position as follows:
- There is too much work to do.
- There is insufficient funding to help schools and colleges complete it.
- We are not entirely certain what works and what doesn’t so we cant cut anything out of fear that we’re getting rid of the one thing that actually made a real difference.
- All of this is taking a catastrophic toll on young teachers who are increasingly choosing other options, taking their training, growing expertise and potential with them.
Of all of these threats, the issue of retention is the one which concerns me the most. I was fortunate enough to start my career in a fantastic department. At break and lunchtimes, we sat in the staffroom and discussed Literature and pedagogy that was working (or, in my case, not). We socialised together and I genuinely woke up each day excited to get back into the school and classroom. I worked stupid hours but mainly because it was taking me 5 hours to mark a set of books. I wasn’t brilliant by any means (I cringe when I remember my reliance on task-led lessons) but I was happy and I felt supported, which means that I was more open to the (sometimes withering but always astute) guidance offered to me by my Head of Department. If not for that solid grounding, I might easily have quit when the challenges became more testing.
Over the last 20 years, I must have worked with hundreds of teachers. I’ve seen good ones who left and not-so-good ones who possibly should have, but the overall conclusion is that when it comes to teacher retention you have to play the cards you are dealt. Most people want to be better and sometimes the behaviours exhibited, which cause others so much angst, are simply mechanisms developed to help them cope in a profession which can be brutal. Feeling inundated by emails? Don’t reply to any. Stressed by the behaviour of an unruly class? Ignore it and find a way to block out the chaos. Overwhelmed by the workload? Do lots of things badly and become increasingly tired to the point when your only reaction is fight or flight.
We have a moral responsibility to support our colleagues, to give them sufficient opportunities to experience success, and to help them address areas of their work which may need improvement. Tough love has to incorporate love, otherwise it’s just tough!
The very best schools make their own agendas; they don’t follow them. The best leaders understand that Stephen Covey’s pithy line about focusing on the core business- “The main thing is to keep the main thing about the main thing.”- is a way of life not a bumper sticker. The best teachers understand that a few minutes of evaluation here and there can save hours of wasted energy later. It starts at the top and it requires leaders to be brave, to judge what works and what doesn’t, and to make decisions which impact the most on the outcomes of the children in our care.
Over the next 5 years, I suspect that the best schools will find a way to:
- improve the quality and regularity of professional learning so that people feel valued;
- develop real collaboration between colleagues, departments and schools which lead to the sharing of ideas, shortcuts and curriculum innovations that benefit and enrich the learning of children;
- effectively model what a healthy work-life balance looks like;
- find ways to resolve the marking and feedback dilemma (I’d argue that context, as always, is king here and that a personalised approach is required);
- improve teacher wellbeing;
- create opportunities for teacher-led action research to both improve pupil outcomes and also to offer creative opportunities for practitioners who otherwise would look for this creativity outside of teaching;
- use the PMR process for professional development (and therefore increased job satisfaction), rather than as a blunt measurement of how someone has performed against 3-4 objectives linked to a meagre financial reward (which can lead to dissatisfaction);
- use labour-saving IT (such as ClassCharts, which so far does everything it promised it would) to reduce workload;
- create cultures that make people think twice (and even three times) before leaving;
- engage with the ideas of thinkers such as Greg McKeown and focus on doing fewer things, really well.
I suspect good schools will do all of these things and more. The hope is that more schools will follow. Job satisfaction shouldn’t be the prerogative of the lucky few.